Legal Opinion

Albritton v. . Albritton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

The appellant makes nine assignments of error and brings them all forward in bis brief. The first four are to the court’s rulings upon the admission and the exclusion of evidence, the next four to portions of the charge, and the last to the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict and to the judgment as rendered.

The first assignment of error to the rulings upon the evidence (exceptions 2 and 3) is to the court’s permitting a witness, Mrs. Stokes, to testify that she saw the plaintiff and saw that she bad a black eye and that she was nervous. This evidence was competent to corroborate the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Baynes v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Eaves Ex Rel. Eaves v. CoxeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. . VaughanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Pruett v. PruettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Poniros v. Nello L. Teer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Deaton v. DeatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Hagedorn v. . HagedornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API