Legal Opinion

Staten Island Edison Corp. v. Maltbie

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1948Published

1Opinion of the CourtBookstein, J.

Plaintiff instituted this plenary action in equity for an injunction against the enforcement of a rate claimed by it to he confiscatory and the right to maintain the action has been upheld (Staten Island Edison Corp. v. Maltbie, 296 N. Y. 374, 297 N. Y. 614).

Defendants now move for summary judgment, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, pursuant to rule 113 of the Eules of Civil Practice upon the ground that the answer in the action sets forth a defense established prima facie hv documentary evidence and official records which is sufficient as a matter of law and which entitles the defendants to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Municipal Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. People Ex Rel. Consolidated Water Co. v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Staten Island Edison Corp. v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. County Transportation Co. v. MaltbieNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Staten Island Edison Corporation v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API