United States v. McGee
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SAVAGE, District Judge.
Following the jury’s verdict finding him guilty of securities fraud1 and perjury,2 defendant Timothy McGee moved for judgment of acquittal or, in the alternative, a new trial. We denied his motion and now explain why.
The trial evidence, viewed in favor of the government, was that McGee obtained information from an insider that Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Company (“PHLY”) was about to be purchased by another company for a price three *469times book value. McGee used the nonpublic information to trade in the company’s stock, which resulted in a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. O'HaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Martha Stewart and Peter BacanovicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Stefan E. BrodieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Timothy McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014