Legal Opinion
United States v. Ure
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 12, 1955No. Nos. 14127, 14128PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
The two suits presently before us were brought against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1846, 2671 et seq. Judgments in damages were awarded below in favor of appellees for the flooding of their lands following breaks in what is known as the North canal of the Owyhee Reclamation project, centered in Malheur County, Oregon. This is a project constructed and being operated by the United States Reclamation Service.
One hundred ninety-one other suits growing out of the same breaks were brought by water users served by the canal seeking…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Harris v. United States. Thomas v. United States. Ellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Brown, Adm'x v. GesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
- Smith v. Lockheed Propulsion Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. The United States of America and the United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.