Legal Opinion
Sierra Club v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 29, 2002No. CIV-02-174-HUPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HUBEL, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs Sierra Club and several other environmental and wildlife organizations, and individual plaintiff Al Thieme, bring this action against defendant United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). As a result of an earlier ruling, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) is an intervenor defendant. Plaintiffs challenge a study to be conducted by the ODFW, funded in part by the FWS, and described in more detail below. Plaintiffs bring three claims. The first two are brought under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sierra Club v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- W. Watersheds Project v. USDA Aphis Wildlife Servs.District Court, D. Idaho · 2018
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. MosbacherDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Lindberg v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- NEW JERSEY OUTDOOR ALLIANCE VS. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.