Legal Opinion
W. Watersheds Project v. USDA Aphis Wildlife Servs.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided June 22, 2018No. Case No. 1:17–CV–206–BLWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
B. Lynn Winmill, Chief U.S. District Court Judge *1139INTRODUCTION
The Court has before it cross-motions for summary judgment, and a motion filed by plaintiffs to consider extra-record material. The Court heard oral argument on May 11, 2018, and took the motions under advisement. For the reasons expressed below, the Court will grant the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, deny the defendant's motion for summary judgment, and deem moot the plaintiffs' motion to consider extra-record material as the Court did not review that material in ruling for plaintiffs.
SUMMARY
For years, Wildlife Services…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Native Ecosystems Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Sierra Club v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
- Wildlands v. WoodruffDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wildearth Guardians v. United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health InspeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- WildEarth Guardians v. SuckowDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- WildEarth Guardians v. USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife ServicesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- Wildearth Guardians v. BucknallDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2024