Legal Opinion

Bohlinger v. Rosenbaum

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The complaint sets forth causes of action in fraud, negligence (not founded on personal injury or death) and conspiracy. The answers are general denials. *236The plaintiff has served notices to examine certain defendants before trial ‘ ‘ upon the following matter: That the examination will be with respect to the material allegations of fact put in issue by the pleadings The respective defendants have moved to vacate such notices.

In view of the fact that, when rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice was adopted in 1952, the Appellate Divisions seemed to have concluded that Bamberger v. Cooke…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bamberger v. CookeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  2. Malus v. Sperry Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  3. Fortgang v. AlpertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Industrial Bank of Commerce v. RubinNew York Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leichtentritt v. LeichtentrittNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Schulsinger v. CowlesNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. J. J. Little & Ives Co. v. Hanover InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API