Leichtentritt v. Leichtentritt
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The action is in libel and slander. The parties are husband and wife who have been recently living separate and apart. Plaintiff husband claims that defendant wife is defaming him in his character as a person and in his profession as a doctor. Each of the parties has served notice to examine the other before trial, and the adversary has in each case moved to vacate.
Pretrial examinations in actions.for defamation are not generally favored in this department (Malus v. Sperry Corp., 133 N. Y. S. 2d 286, affd. 282 App. Div. 939; Rowland v. Stim, 147 N. Y. S. 2d 876, affd. 283 App. Div. 942).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tausik v. TausikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Field v. FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Malus v. Sperry Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Bohlinger v. RosenbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Billingsley v. Better Business Bureau of New York City, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scharf v. ScharfNew York Supreme Court · 1958