Legal Opinion

Fortgang v. Alpert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 28, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action by a physician to recover from defendant for services rendered to defendant and to defendant’s deceased daughter. Order, made on reargument, denying defendant’s motion to modify the notice of examination before trial, modified by striking out item 10 from the notice, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Appeal from the original order dismissed, without costs. Item 10 in the notice of examination is in general terms vague and likely to cause confusion. Items 7 and 8 are proper for the reason that defendant has waived the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clifford v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Munzer v. Swedish American LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  2. Murray v. Physical Culture Hotel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Bohlinger v. RosenbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API