Legal Opinion

Banking Co. v. . Leach

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 27, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER and BROWN, JJ., concurring in part. Appeal from an order allowing W. H. Pace, trustee, as commissions the sum of $350, his attorney, John Boushall, $25, and cost of advertising, $69.30, and the controversy is wholly between the defendants Leach and Pace.

Prior to 3 May, 1915, the defendant M. T. Leach borrowed from the Raleigh Savings Bank and Trust Company the sum of $8,000, and to secure the payment of the same executed a deed of trust to the defendant W. H. Pace upon a storehouse and lot on the east side of Wilmington Street in the city of Raleigh. Default having been made in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Edward SchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Barefoot v. . MusselwhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Gay v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  5. Boyd v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Horner v. Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. SchenckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API