Legal Opinion

Ransom & Randolph Co. v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1944No. 29407PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

This appeal presents the single question: Was the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals affirming the determination of the Tax Commissioner in assessing appellant’s accounts and notes receivable used in and arising out of appellant’s business transacted in Indiana and Michigan reasonable and lawful? In other words, the main question is whether these intangibles have a business situs in or out of this state.

It was the finding of the Board of Tax Appeals that the current accounts and notes receivable here in question which accrued to the appellant in the conduct of its business in the states of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. GlanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Central Ohio Joint Vocational School District Board of Education v. Admr., Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Melvin v. SweeneyOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Haverfield Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. National Cash Register Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API