Stirum v. Whalen
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction
Before the court are cross-motions involving an unusual discovery controversy. During the time period relevant to this lawsuit, defendants Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart, Rhodes & Judge, P.C. and Paul Pontiff, Esq. (collectively, “the attorney defendants” or “Bartlett, Pontiff”) served as attorneys for, among others, co-defendants Raymond J. Whalen, Silver Bow Resources & Chemical Corporation, and Whalen Drilling and Mining Corporation (collectively, “the Whalen defendants”). Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint includes…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. LongoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- United States v. KerikDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- New York State Teamsters Council Prepaid Legal Services Plan v. Primo & CentraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995