Legal Opinion

Stirum v. Whalen

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided January 26, 1993No. 5:90-cv-01279PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM — DECISION AND ORDER

MUNSON, Senior District Judge.

I. Introduction

Before the court are cross-motions involving an unusual discovery controversy. During the time period relevant to this lawsuit, defendants Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart, Rhodes & Judge, P.C. and Paul Pontiff, Esq. (collectively, “the attorney defendants” or “Bartlett, Pontiff”) served as attorneys for, among others, co-defendants Raymond J. Whalen, Silver Bow Resources & Chemical Corporation, and Whalen Drilling and Mining Corporation (collectively, “the Whalen defendants”). Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint includes…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. LongoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
  2. United States v. KerikDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  3. New York State Teamsters Council Prepaid Legal Services Plan v. Primo & CentraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API