Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Deloitte & Touche
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided October 1, 1992No. LR-C-90-520PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EISELE, District Judge.
The defendant’s motion to dismiss is presently before the Court. The motion has been briefed, supplementally briefed, rebriefed and letter briefed by both sides, and is now more than ready for disposition. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
I
Beneath its legal and factual complexity, this is a relatively straightforward professional negligence case.
FirstSouth, F.A. used to be a federally chartered and insured, publicly held savings and loan association. 1 On December 4,1986, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Buchwald v. Renco Group, Inc. (In Re Magnesium Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Ameriwood Industries International Corp. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
- Scioto Memorial Hospital Ass'n v. Price WaterhouseOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Waslow v. Grant Thornton LLP (In Re Jack Greenberg, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Medical Liability Mutual Insurance v. Alan Curtis LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.