Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Reynolds
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 23, 1976No. 51997PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
One of the contentions urged by the appellant is that this action was against both the insurer and its employee-agent, Hamby, based on a contract between the plaintiff and Hamby, and that a verdict finding in favor of Hamby but against Allstate is self-contradictory. The petition itself is in two counts (the second added by amendment) but as we construe Count 1 it is directed against the insurer based on a breach of duty to pay in accordance with its contract while Count 2 is directed against Hamby as an individual, in that after agreeing to procure the insurance, he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parris & Son, Inc. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Ambler v. ArcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Sutker v. Pennsylvania InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Fields v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Clark v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cook v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- King v. BrasingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Georgia Building Services, Inc. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Klemme Cattle Co. v. Westwind Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Jordan v. Santa Fe Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.