Legal Opinion

United States v. Cortes-Medina

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 12, 2016No. 14-1101P2PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

In this sentencing appeal, defendant-appellant Héctor Cortés-Medina insists that his 168-month sentence is both procedurally flawed and substantively unreasonable. After careful consideration, we affirm the sentence.1

This appeal has its roots in an indictment returned by a federal grand jury sitting in the District of Puerto Rico. The indictment alleged that the defendant served as an “enforcer” for a drug-trafficking ring and charged him as a participant in a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute controlled substances within 1, 000 feet of a protected location.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. United States v. DuarteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. Rivera-MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Delgado-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Diaz-LugoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Rondón-GarcíaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Marrero-PerezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API