United States v. Cortes-Medina
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
In this sentencing appeal, defendant-appellant Héctor Cortés-Medina insists that his 168-month sentence is both procedurally flawed and substantively unreasonable. After careful consideration, we affirm the sentence.1
This appeal has its roots in an indictment returned by a federal grand jury sitting in the District of Puerto Rico. The indictment alleged that the defendant served as an “enforcer” for a drug-trafficking ring and charged him as a participant in a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute controlled substances within 1, 000 feet of a protected location.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States v. DuarteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. Rivera-MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Delgado-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Diaz-LugoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Rondón-GarcíaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Marrero-PerezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.