Legal Opinion
United States v. Rondón-García
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 23, 2018No. 17-1098PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
In this sentencing appeal, the Defendant-Appellant Santos Daniel Rondón-García ("Rondón") insists that his eighteen-month sentence is both procedurally and substantively unreasonable. After careful review, we affirm.
I. Background
As this appeal concerns the imposition of the defendant's sentence, we briefly summarize the relevant facts and charted course of this case. We note that, because Rondón pled guilty and does not challenge the factual background, we draw those facts from the change-of-plea colloquy, the unchallenged portions of the Presentence Investigation…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. DuarteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. Marrero-PerezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Diaz-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Severino-PachecoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Contreras-DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Rodriguez-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.