Legal Opinion
Shaterian v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 7, 2011No. Case No. 11-00920 SCPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART WELLS FARGO’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING WELLS FARGO’S MOTION TO STRIKE
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (‘Wells Fargo”) moves to dismiss and strike Plaintiff Nader Shaterian’s (“Shaterian”) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). ECF Nos. 60 (“MTD”); 61 (“MTS”). Wells Fargo’s motions are fully briefed, though Wells Fargo has not filed a reply brief in support of its Motion to Strike. ECF Nos. 72 (“MTS Opp’n”), 73 (“MTD Opp’n”), 74 (“MTD Reply”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Rees v. PNC Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Griffin v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Henning v. Wachovia Mortgage, FSBDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Armstead v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- (PS) Gifford v. DingmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.