Legal Opinion

(PS) Gifford v. Dingman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 20, 2021No. 2:21-cv-01726Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGER GIFFORD, No. 2:21-CV-1726-KJM-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CLINT DINGMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the 18 Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 46, to strike Defendants’ answers. Defendants have filed an 19 opposition, ECF No. 47. Plaintiff has filed a reply, ECF No. 56. The matter has been submitted 20 without oral argument. 21 22 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 23 Plaintiff initiated this action on September 22,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Luz M. SANTIAGO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Sanchez v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
  3. Shaterian v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
  4. Holmes v. Electronic Document Processing, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API