Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Las Vegas Sands, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 2002No. 35738PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Agosti, J.:

This appeal concerns whether time spent in mandatory court-annexed arbitration is included under the NRCP 41(e) five-year *317period within which a plaintiff must bring an action to trial. Appellant David D. Morgan filed suit against respondent Las Vegas Sands in the district court, claiming breach of an agreement under which Morgan supplied roadside billboard advertising for the Sands in exchange for a monthly fee. The matter was referred to mandatory court-annexed arbitration under the Nevada Arbitration Rules. Approximately one year later, the arbitrator issued…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lindauer v. AllenNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Thran v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Home Savings Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Boren v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Johnson v. HarberNevada Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Edwards v. GhandourNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cox v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Moon v. McDonald, Carano & Wilson, LLPNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Rickard v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. D.R. HORTON, INC. VS. DIST. CT. (ARLINGTON RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASS'N.)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API