Edwards v. Ghandour
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
INTRODUCTION
These proper person appeals present us with an opportunity to clarify two issues: (1) that our decision in Rickard v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 1 holding that a defendant’s bankruptcy operates to toll NRCP 41(e)’s five-year period for bringing an action to trial, applies only to the particular defendant or defendants who have filed for bankruptcy protection, not to defendants who are not bank ruptcy debtors; and (2) that an appeal from the district court’s final judgment does not affect that judgment’s finality for purposes of claim preclusion.
In the proceedings below,…
3Cases cited28 opinions
- A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Nicholas M. Patton v. Richard Bearden, Robert Bearden, and J.M. Bearden, Individually, and D/B/A Bearden Fish FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by18 opinions
- Five Star Capital Corp. v. RubyNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Ozawa v. Vision Airlines, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Creative Touch Interiors v. Dist. Ct. (Brown)Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- D.R. HORTON, INC. VS. DIST. CT. (ARLINGTON RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASS'N.)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
- D.R. HORTON, INC. VS. DIST. CT. (ARLINGTON RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASS'N.)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.