Legal Opinion
United States v. Hemmons
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 25, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-1449PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAHN, District Judge.
Before the court are the plaintiff’s Motion for summary judgment on its claim and to dismiss the defendant’s counterclaim. For the reasons set forth below, these Motions will be granted.
I. Factual Background
On February 27, 1979 the defendants, Alfred and Barbara Hemmons [“the defendants”] borrowed $8,000 from Greater Bethlehem Savings and Loan [“the bank”] for the purpose of improving their home. See Def. Ans. ¶ 3; Pl.Ex. A. In order to borrow the money, the defendants signed a loan agreement, a promissory note, and a confession of judgment. See Pl.Ex. A; K. The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- David Cutler Industries, Ltd. v. Bank of America (In re David Cutler Industries, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- In re FreemanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Miller v. Jannetta (In re Irwin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Dill v. Pennsylvania, Department of Public WelfareDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Holmes v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.