Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bulkley

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1902No. 2206PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the District Court of Pitkin County.

1Opinion of the CourtGunter, J.

A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained and a judgment of dismissal entered. Plaintiff appealed. The allegations of the complaint pertinent to this ruling are: Plaintiff is and was at all times mentioned therein a stockholder of The Tabor Mines and Mills Company, a corporation; and sues for himself and others similarly situated. June 12, 1893, the president and secretary of the corporation gave a note and trust deed, the latter, on corporate real estate, with the purpose of borrowing funds for the individual use of said president; obtained the same thereby, and the money so obtained…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Hawkins v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Holland v. Duluth Iron Mining & Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Miller v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  5. Beshoar v. ChappellColorado Court of Appeals · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bell v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  2. Van Schaack v. PhippsColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Brooks v. Land Drilling Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  4. Horst v. TraudtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. German Evangelical Emmaus Church v. Free Evangelical Emmaus ChurchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API