Legal Opinion

Norris v. Heyward

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 13, 1993No. 23963Published

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Justice:

This is an appeal from the master’s order granting respondents a continuing judgment and dismissing appellant’s counterclaim. We reverse and remand.

■ FACTS

In December 1985 appellant Albert R. Heyward and respondents entered into a partnership agreement to purchase a mini-storage facility in Panama City, Florida. Heyward had a 50.4% interest in the partnership and respondents each had a 12.4% interest. These interests were later amended so that Heyward possessed 40% and each respondent 15%.

The mini-storage facility began losing money in 1986. In 1987, with the facility…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peeples v. HornikSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Lawson v. RogersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Burch v. AshburnCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Bray v. HeadCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API