Norris v. Heyward
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Moore, Justice:
This is an appeal from the master’s order granting respondents a continuing judgment and dismissing appellant’s counterclaim. We reverse and remand.
■ FACTS
In December 1985 appellant Albert R. Heyward and respondents entered into a partnership agreement to purchase a mini-storage facility in Panama City, Florida. Heyward had a 50.4% interest in the partnership and respondents each had a 12.4% interest. These interests were later amended so that Heyward possessed 40% and each respondent 15%.
The mini-storage facility began losing money in 1986. In 1987, with the facility…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peeples v. HornikSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Lawson v. RogersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Burch v. AshburnCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Bray v. HeadCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993