Legal Opinion

Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 27, 1989No. 22995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Chief Justice:

These actions were commenced by 271 plaintiffs alleging various personal injuries and property damage caused by air and water pollution from appellant-respondent’s (Nassau’s) plant. The circuit court sua sponte consolidated all cases for a single non-jury trial by invoking an equitable remedy known as a bill of peace. Nassau appeals. The circuit court also dismissed with prejudice the claims of thirty-eight plaintiffs, eight of whom appeal. We reverse.

Nassau claims its right to a jury trial was violated by the order consolidating all claims for a single non-jury trial.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Standard Warehouse Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  2. Collins Music Co. v. LightseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Floyd v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Rim Associates v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Mortgage Recovery Fund-Riverbend, Ltd. v. Heritage Clipper Riverbend TrustCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Rickerson v. KarlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  5. Norris v. HeywardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API