Legal Opinion

Clark v. Cross

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1908No. 7414PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of King county, Gilliam, J., entered June 29, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial before the court without a jury, in an action for services rendered.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

— The substance of the complaint in this case is that the plaintiff, under an agreement with defendants, furnished teams and drivers for certain railroad construction work, in which said work the defendants were engaged as subcontractors, the price to be paid for the services of said teams being agreed upon; and that said services amounted to a certain sum. Certain itemized credits were then set forth in .the complaint and a balance struck, which left, as the complaint alleges, $333.50 due from defendants to plaintiff. Certain other services were then alleged, amounting in value to $112.50,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Freiberg, Kline & Co. v. MagaleTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Reynolds v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Johnson v. Kindred State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Willard v. DavisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1903
  5. Cudworth v. GaynorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nichols v. SevertsenWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Turner v. Tjosevig-Kennecott Copper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API