Nichols v. Severtsen
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
This is an action for damages for malicious prosecution based upon the alleged wrongful initiation of insanity proceedings. A demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained, and plaintiff has appealed from a judgment dismissing the action.
Actions for damages for malicious prosecution are not favored in law, although they will be readily upheld when the proper elements have been presented. Peasley v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co., 13 Wn. (2d) 485, 125 P. (2d) 681. To support an action of this nature, the complaint must allege (1) that a prosecution was commenced against the plaintiff;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peasley v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Ellern v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re HigdonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Lockhart v. ClaypoolWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Howard v. HansonWashington Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Von Bulow Ex Rel. Auersperg v. Von BulowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- State v. AlterWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Baird v. Intermountain School Federal Credit UnionUtah Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.