Legal Opinion

Prospero Associates v. Burroughs Corp.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided July 8, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-K-1801PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, District Judge.

This diversity action arises from a purchase agreement executed by plaintiff and defendant’s predecessor in interest, Redac-tron Corporation. 1 Plaintiff filed this action in state court, seeking the costs that it incurred when Redactron, pursuant to the purchase agreement, repurchased equipment from plaintiff. Defendant removed the action to this court. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that a prior judgment of the Boulder County District Court, Prospero Associates, et al. v. Redactron…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. City of Westminster v. ChurchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. Yvonne A. Adams v. Campbell County School District, Campbell County WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  5. Newby v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prospero Associates, a Colorado General Partnership v. Burroughs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. Tague & Beem, P.C. v. Tague (In Re Tague)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1991
  3. Prospero Associates, a Colorado General Partnership v. Burroughs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API