Legal Opinion

Lusk-Harbison-Jones, Inc. v. Universal Credit Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1933No. 30351PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

During the years herein mentioned, appellant was the authorized agent for Ford automobiles at Leland and adjacent territory. Appellee is a dealer in automobile paper; that is to say, it advances the cash to the local distributors of automobiles on the conditional sales contracts and notes of the purchasers evidencing deferred installment payments. It would appear from the record that appellee is a subsidiary of the Ford company. In any event, it works in close connection with that, company and its local distributors. In 1929 three, and in 1930, two, sales contracts were purchased by appellee…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Sanders v. DantzlerMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Daniel J. Vogel and Desmia G. Vogel v. American Warranty Home Service Corporation And/or Its Successors, Pioneer Warranty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Anderson Const. Co., Inc. v. Lyon Metal Prod.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Sheridan v. GreenbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API