Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Bustamante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 1809 to determine the validity of a claim, the administrators of the decedent’s estate appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Radigan, S.), dated July 15, 1997, which denied their motion to vacate a lien and dismiss the claim as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent payable out of the estate.

The appellants, the administrators of the subject estate, seek to vacate a lien and dismiss as time-barred a claim filed against the estate by the respondent, County of Nassau, pursuant to Social Services Law §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In re the Estate of ColonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  3. Hoke v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. In re the Estate of CudahyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966
  5. In re the Estate of HolmesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heath v. WojtowiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Christopher v. TomeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API