Legal Opinion

Christopher v. Tomeck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

In 1997, defendant Edward M. Tomeck applied for Medicaid coverage. Plaintiff denied the application, finding that Tomeck and his wife, Margaret M. Tomeck (hereinafter decedent), had excess income and assets. Rather than dispose of the excess resources, decedent chose to file a spousal refusal, which permitted her husband to qualify for coverage but allowed her to keep her excess resources. Decedent died in 2002. In March 2004, plaintiff filed a notice of claim against decedent’s estate, seeking reimbursement of the benefits that were paid to decedent’s husband for the period between July 1997…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re Estate of TomeckNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Durazinski v. ChandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Ehrler v. CataffoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Commissioner of the Department of Social Services v. FishmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. In re the Estate of TomeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thea v. KleinhandlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. Thea v. KleinhandlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API