Legal Opinion

Shannon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 30, 1986No. 296-84PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant was charged by indictment with the offense of delivery of a controlled *851substance, to-wit: diazepam, in an amount over 400 grams. It is undisputed that appellant agreed to plead guilty in exchange for the State’s agreement to recommend reduction of the charge to possession of over 400 grams of diazepam and to recommend two years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. In accordance with this plea bargain, the appellant on January 25, 1983, entered a plea of guilty to possession of diazepam and was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Ex Parte CrispCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RichCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Van Hoang v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Smith, Al LetroyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API