Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Rich

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 2006No. AP-75,112PublishedCited by 291 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

*510 OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · MeyersMeyers, J.

in which PRICE, KEASLER, HERVEY, and HOLCOMB, JJ, joined.

The issue we decide today is whether Applicant should be allowed to raise a claim of illegal sentence based on an improper enhancement for the first time on a writ of habeas corpus, or whether such claim is forfeited by: 1) Applicant’s failure to raise it on direct appeal; or 2) Applicant’s plea of true to such enhancements during the plea proceedings. We conclude that Applicant may raise such a claim and that, in this case, he is entitled to relief.

Facts

Applicant David Alan Rich1 was charged with felony driving while…

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Ex Parte YbarraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Ex Parte SeidelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by291 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ChavezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Burt, Lemuel CarlCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Parrott, Ex Parte Jimmie Mark Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  4. Ex parte FournierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Ex parte PueCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018

286 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API