Legal Opinion

Lysable Transport, Inc. v. Patton

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided December 28, 2010No. 0868103PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELSEY, Judge.

The Workers’ Compensation Commission awarded benefits to Scott Patton under the de facto award doctrine, effectively precluding the employer from exercising its statutory right to contest compensability of Patton’s claim. In the alternative, the commission held Patton proved compensability by a pre ponderance of the evidence. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.

I

In March 2007, Scott Patton was injured when he drove his truck off the road while working for Lysable Transport, Inc. Despite inconclusive information regarding the cause of the accident, the employer…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pinkerton's, Inc. v. HelmesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  2. National Linen Service v. McGuinnCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  3. City of Salem v. ColegroveSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. Clifton v. Clifton Cable Contracting, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  5. Henrico Public Utilities v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cary O'Donoghue v. United Continental Holdings, Inc. and United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
  2. Virginia Tree Harvesters, Inc. v. George W. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
  3. Marlin Roske v. Culbertson Company and Virginia Surety Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
  4. Tyco Electronics and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Tony Alvin VanPeltCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
  5. Daryl O. Tyler v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API