Legal Opinion

De Ponce v. System Freight Service

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 1944No. Civ. 3256PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This isan appeal from a judgment in favor of Maria M. De Ponce for damages resulting from the death of her son, Rudolph M. Suarez, and a judgment in favor of Cipriano M. Rodriguez for damages to his truck and its load. The cases were consolidated for trial and on appeal.

Appellant presents but one ground for a reversal of the judgment: refusal to give an instruction requested by it, which, after quoting subdivision “a” of section 525 of the Vehicle Code, continued as follows:

“Should you find from all the evidence in this ease that Rudolph Suarez at the time or immediately prior to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Jolley v. ClemensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Mathers v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Kehlor v. SatterleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Cannon v. KemperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leo v. DunhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hooper v. BronsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Biggar v. CarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Leo v. DunhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Serpa v. Berchtold CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API