Legal Opinion

Leo v. Dunham

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1953No. L. A. 22613Published

1Opinion of the Court

41 Cal.2d 712 (1953)

W. A. LEO, Appellant,

v.

RUFUS ALBERTSON DUNHAM, Respondent.

L. A. No. 22613.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Dec. 4, 1953.

A. J. O'Connor and H. K. Lyle for Appellant.

Bauder, Gilbert, Thompson & Kelly and Jean Wunderlich for Respondent.

EDMONDS, J.

A Ford tank truck operated by Rufus A. Dunham struck and seriously injured Willard A. Leo. Upon his appeal from the judgment in favor of Dunham, Leo charges that the instructions to the jury upon the doctrine of imminent peril were prejudically erroneous.

The accident occurred when Leo walked across a highway running north and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Leo v. DunhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Arundel v. TurkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API