Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1956PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Sec. 958.07, Stats, (new number), provides that the writ of error cor am nobis may be issued under certain circumstances. It is a writ of long standing. The leading Wisconsin cases concerning it are In re Ernst (1923), 179 Wis. 646, 192 N. W. 65, and State v. Dingman (1941), 239 Wis. 188, 300 N. W. 244. These cases and the texts make it clear that this writ is highly discretionary and the determination of the court to which the application was made will not be reversed unless it very clearly appears that discretion was abused. The writ will not lie if an appeal may be taken to correct the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jessner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. In re ErnstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Oehler v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State v. DingmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SingletonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. State v. EsserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. CatheyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Cullen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Jessen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API