Pugh v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Laurel Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
William Rogers Clay, Commissioner —
Affirming.
Sometime prior to the 23d of February, 1912, plaintiff, Robert M. Jackson, Jr., entered into a contract with •the Pitman Coal Company, which was afterwards reduced to writing. Under this contract he leased from the Pitman Coal Company all the coal between the Pitts-burg Coal Company’s line and the Pitman Coal Company’s switch. Under the terms of the agreement, plaintiff was to receive 85 cents per ton, the Pitman Coal Company 5 cents per ton, the Pittsburg Coal Company 5 cents per ton, and W. A. Pugh, who as agent, was to…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Harsha v. State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Union Cotton Co. v. BondurantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Merchants Bank of Canada v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Doddridge v. American Trust & Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.