Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 20, 1913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Laurel Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner —

Affirming.

Sometime prior to the 23d of February, 1912, plaintiff, Robert M. Jackson, Jr., entered into a contract with •the Pitman Coal Company, which was afterwards reduced to writing. Under this contract he leased from the Pitman Coal Company all the coal between the Pitts-burg Coal Company’s line and the Pitman Coal Company’s switch. Under the terms of the agreement, plaintiff was to receive 85 cents per ton, the Pitman Coal Company 5 cents per ton, the Pittsburg Coal Company 5 cents per ton, and W. A. Pugh, who as agent, was to…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harsha v. State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Union Cotton Co. v. BondurantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. Merchants Bank of Canada v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Doddridge v. American Trust & Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API