Legal Opinion

Waterbury v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 2, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, S. C. C.

While these motions are in form to non-pros, plaintiffs for failure to post adequate security for costs, on the argument they were regarded as an interlocutory matter of practice, involving a step in the cause, arising under rule 94 of the Supreme Court, with the understanding that the meritorious question discussed should be determined.

The plaintiffs are non-residents and seek compensation for injuries alleged to have been received in an automobile accident which occurred at Somerville, in this state. The vehicle in which they were it appears became entangled with a wire or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. M. Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New York v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  3. Myers v. MyersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  4. Sheehan v. La Belle Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  5. Marino v. Shiff Realty Co.Court of Common Pleas of New Jersey · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Lawrence v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API