Legal Opinion

Raymer v. Hi-Line Transport, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1964No. 9996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice.

Appellant, Millers’ Mutual Insurance Association, was the collision insurer of Donald Raymer’s automobile which was totally destroyed in an accident with a truck owned and operated by respondent, Hi-Line Transport, Inc. At the time of the accident, Hi-Line had liability coverage with Central Casualty Company. Millers’, having paid Raymer for his loss '(less $50 deductible), commenced this action, as a subrogee, against Hi-Line for the damages to Ray-mer’s automobile. The lower court entered 1 a judgment of no cause of action, and Millers’ appeals therefrom.

Under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johanson v. Cudahy Packing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Cederloff v. WhitedUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. American Insurance v. Ellsworth Freight Lines, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. MoyerUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re WilliamsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
  3. Dennis v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  4. Allen v. MoyerUtah Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API