Legal Opinion

Allen v. Moyer

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2011No. 20090841Published

1Opinion of the Court

259 P.3d 1049 (2011)

2011 UT 44

Andrew T. ALLEN, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Melissa MOYER, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 20090841.

Supreme Court of Utah.

July 29, 2011.

Daniel L. Wilson, Scott G. Nance, Ogden, for plaintiff.

Kent R. Holmberg, Salt Lake City, for defendant.

Associate Chief Justice DURRANT, opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 In this case, we are asked to determine whether the doctrine of claim preclusion applies to small claims judgments. We conclude that claim preclusion is applicable to small claims judgments because application of the doctrine will promote finality, judicial economy,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Oman v. Davis School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. MacK v. Utah State Department of CommerceUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Hindmarsh v. MockIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. City of Grantsville v. Redevelopment Agency of Tooele CityUtah Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API