Legal Opinion

Mehrstein v. Mehrstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1966No. Civ. 29853PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFleming, J.

Appeal from a judgment terminating a husband’s support obligation under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1650-1692, 9C U.L.A.)

The parties married in Florida in 1953 and separated in New York in 1958. They had no children. In 1963 the wife, a resident of New York, brought suit for support in New York under the uniform act against her husband, a California resident. After certification of the case by New York, the initiating state, to California, the responding state (Code Civ. Proc., § 1680), the Los Angeles Superior Court found the husband owed a duty of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Worthley v. WorthleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hudson v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hull v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Mueller v. MuellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Helmick v. HelmickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Gray v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Quigley v. QuigleySupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Fishman v. FishmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Morris v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API