Legal Opinion

United States v. Sabino

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 19, 2001No. Nos. 99-3745, 99-3785, 99-3786 and 99-3863PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHN, Senior District Judge.

Defendants Daniel Stewart (Mr. Stewart), Donna Stewart (Mrs. Stewart), and Joe Sabino (Sabino) (collectively the defendants) were convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States by obstructing the functions of the United States Internal Revenue Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The Stewarts were also convicted of tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201.

The Stewarts appeal their convictions, raising the following issues: whether the Speedy Trial Act was violated; whether their Fifth Amendment right to remain silent was violated when their…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Ingram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Henry A. BosticCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Philip A. ChanceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. BedfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. CrockettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. MikutowiczCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API