United States v. Sabino
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHN, Senior District Judge.
Defendants Daniel Stewart (Mr. Stewart), Donna Stewart (Mrs. Stewart), and Joe Sabino (Sabino) (collectively the defendants) were convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States by obstructing the functions of the United States Internal Revenue Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The Stewarts were also convicted of tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201.
The Stewarts appeal their convictions, raising the following issues: whether the Speedy Trial Act was violated; whether their Fifth Amendment right to remain silent was violated when their…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ingram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Henry A. BosticCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Philip A. ChanceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. BedfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. CrockettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. MikutowiczCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.