Kraft v. Egan
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. This appeal was taken from a pro forma decree of the lower Court (Dennis J.,) dismissing the bill of complaint, with costs to the defendant. The case is stated in the opinion of this Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.
The first appeal in this case is reported in 76 Md., 243. It was a bill filed for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land and improvements. On that appeal we held the contract to be sufficiently certain in description, and that the rent was a sub-rent. Afterwards the appellee Egan, answered the bill, alleging that the written agreement did not correctly state the contract between the parties; that the complainants were to sell the whole fee simple for $27,500, and not subject to a ground rent of $600 a year; and that the contract had been signed by mistake.
The following…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Semmes v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- Dulany v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Geiger v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1846
- Moale v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1840
- Popplein v. FoleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Somerville v. CoppageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
- Caplan v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Diffenderffer v. KnocheCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Kappelman v. BowieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.