Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Popplein v. Foley

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 21, 1884PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeals from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The cases are stated in the opinion of the Court. •

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

The records in these cases show that Popplein and Eschbach entered into two written contracts, dated 10th of March, 1816, by which they agreed to lease two adjoining vacant lots of ground fronting on Eutaw Place, in the City of Baltimore, one from Marcella Mactavish, trustee of O. O. Mactavish, and the other from Daniel J. Foley, trustee of Emily Mactavish. The two agreements are in precisely the same terms; and but one of them need be stated. It is as follows:

*383“ Baltimore, March 10, 1876.
“ We hereby agree to lease of Daniel J. Foley, trustee-of Emily Mactavish, deceased, a lot of ground…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smoot v. ReaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
  2. Moale v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1840
  3. Myers v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. The Glendale Corp. v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Soehnlein v. PumphreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. Barranco v. KostensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Ward v. NewboldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  5. Warren Manufacturing Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API