– State v. Lyman –
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 114,312 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER LYMAN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. To establish the right to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, a criminal defendant must show: (1) that the newly proffered evidence could not have been produced at trial with reasonable diligence; and (2) that it is of such materiality that it would be likely to produce a different result upon retrial. 2. Three essential elements must exist in a claim alleging violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194,
10 L. Ed. 2d 215
(1963):…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- United States v. NacchioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. AguirreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- State v. LemmieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- State v. CrudoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- State v. SinnardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. HindsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.