Helm v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, and DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
On May 29, 2009, the Court heard oral argument on defendants’ motions to dismiss and defendants’ motions for sanctions. Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and for good cause shown, the Court rules as follows.
BACKGROUND
A. Procedural Background
These related cases involve potential…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Foster Poultry Farms v. Alkar-Rapidpak-MP Equipment, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Wang v. Chinese Daily News, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc. v. MuddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Alvarez-Soto v. B. Frank Joy, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.