Legal Opinion
Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc. v. Mudd
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 30, 2012No. Nos. 08 Civ. 7831(PAC), 09 MDL 2013(PAC), 09 Civ. 6102(PAC), 10 Civ. 2781(PAC), 10 Civ. 9184(PAC)PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
PAUL A. CROTTY, District Judge.
The above captioned private securities actions allege, generally, that Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), its executives, and certain underwriters made material misstatements in FNMA’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in various securities offerings, concerning FNMA’s (1) subprime and Alt-A exposure; (2) risk management controls; and (3) core capital financials. While many of the private action plaintiffs have joined the securities class action (“Class Action”), Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc.…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- In re Lululemon Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Nguyen v. FXCM Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- In re Banco Bradesco S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Ohio Public Employees Retirement System v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Sharette v. Credit Suisse InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.