Legal Opinion

United States v. H. S. Dorf & Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided June 4, 1953No. A. R. D. 28; Entry No. 782079PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

This is an application for review of a decision and judgment of a single judge sitting in reappraisement, wherein it was held that certain white cornaline rods, in chief value of glass, were dutiable at the entered value of $0.60 per kilo. In arriving at that conclusion, the trial court determined that France was the country of exportation of the involved merchandise, and, hence, that the appraised value of U. S. $0.8652 per kilo, net packed, which was based upon a Mexican cost of production, was predicated upon an erroneous theory of law. It was therefore stated that:

The only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flagler v. KiddCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  2. Kidd v. FlaglerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1893
  3. Moore Dry Goods Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. United States v. American Railway Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nichols & Co. v. Untied StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. H. J. Heinz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Bailey Mora Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API