Legal Opinion

H. J. Heinz Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 21, 1954No. Reap. Dec. 8309; Entry Nos. 739 and 957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

These reappraisements involve the proper value for duty purposes of certain tomato pulp, the product of France, which was shipped to this country from England. The first shipment, entry 739, exported December 7, 1950, was described as F-l and F-5, 10- x 5-kilo tins, and invoiced and entered at sterling 114-6-3 per 1,000 kilos, net packed, and as F-2, 6- x 5-kilo tins, invoiced and entered at sterling 101-17-3 per 1,000 kilos, net packed. In the second shipment, entry 957, exported February 7, 1951, both the F-l and F-5, 10- x 5-lcilo tins, and F-2, 6- x 5-kilo tins, were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. WeckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Stairs v. PeasleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. Scharf Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Maier v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. H. J. Heinz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API