Legal Opinion

Moore Dry Goods Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 17, 1923No. 2192PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Presiding Judge

In the early months of the year 1920 the appellant shipped a large stock of dry goods, valued at about $200,000, from San Francisco to Vladivostok, Siberia. The goods were consigned under a contract of sale to certain merchants of the latter city, and drafts with appropriate shipping documents attached were drawn upon the consignees for the price of the merchandise.

*450The goods arrived at the port of Vladivostok and were landed there in customs custody. But at that time a state of political confusion existed in that city, and its financial and commercial affairs were completely disorganized. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kidd v. FlaglerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1893
  2. McGlinchy v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1875
  3. Ten Cases of OpiumDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1864

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. American Railway Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. Nassau Distributing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. United States v. H. S. Dorf & Co.United States Customs Court · 1953
  4. D. & B. Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  5. Protest 83248-K of RiceUnited States Customs Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API